SCREEN-L Archives

February 1996, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
doellner christian m <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Feb 1996 13:00:09 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Dead Man Walking is a moving film and given the technical
difficulties that Tim Robbins was forced to deal with, I think it is
even a greater testament to Susan Sarandon and Sean Penn's acting.
When I talk of technical difficulties I'm revering to the static shot
selection that was dictated by Penn's incarceration and the resulting
reliance on Penn and Sarandon being shot with pexi-glass or prison
bars as barriers between the two. Robbin's austere approach
stylistically was especially appropriate during Penn's final
walk to the execution room. The conspicuous "absence" of emotion
swelling music during Penn and Sarandon's final good-bye indicated
that Robbins was'nt going to take the easy way out.
 
Given Robbin's leftist politics and any resulting expectations
based on that, Dead Man Walking is even-handed and lacking a zealous
diatribe quality that could have potentially compromised the film,
but one shot in the film continues to disturb me.
 
During the scene of Penn's death we have a montage sequence that cuts
back to a flash-back to the victims that Penn killed laying in the
field where they were left to be discovered. The main thrust of the
scene as a whole reinforced the tragic consequences of all the
victims -be it a victim of random violence or state-sanctioned, but
during the end of this sequence we see Penn's victims
reflected/superimposed on the window in the execution room. Both
victims are attired in formal ware and are suppose to convey some
type of spectral presence.
 
This shot was particularly jarring and seemed to under-cut the film
as a whole. It seemed cheap and implied a self-righteousness that
the film lacked as whole. It almost appeared as if Robbin's was
making an apologist gesture in light of the focus on Penn's
character.
 
Maybe, this seems like nit-picking but given the tightness and lack
of gratuitous cliches in the film as a whole, the "ghost" shot does
serious damage to the integrity of the film - even if only
aesthetically. How does anyone else feel?
 
                                                Christian Doellner
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2