SCREEN-L Archives

January 1996, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
lang thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Jan 1996 05:22:07 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
*****  I doubt you'll find a simple definition for the good reason that
film noir is a genre "created" by critics rather than filmmakers,
audiences or what have you.  (Nobody in the 40s or 50s was saying "Hey
let's go see a film noir tonight" or "Hey let's put a twist on that old
film noir formula.")  It's not even necessarily crime movies; even
though i can't think of an example where there is *no* crime at all,
that may not be the main focus of the film.  LT
 
 
 
In <[log in to unmask]> "Peter S. Latham"
<[log in to unmask]> writes:
>
>I have been looking for a simple and quotable definition of "film
noir."
>Unlike most film terms which have fairly standard meanings, the
definitions
>of "film noir" that I have seen vary widely, e.g. "any crime movie
depicitng
>a fatalistic universe made between 1941 and 1960" or "any crime movie
made in
>black and white with odd camera angles and low-key, high contrast
lighting"
>etc. etc. Any thoughts?
>
>Peter
>
>----
>To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF
SCREEN-L
>in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2