SCREEN-L Archives

December 1995, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: looking for Godard
From:
Rob Tregenza <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Nov 1995 19:51:10 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
You are correct about this M. Frank is wrong.  The context (which is part of

the existential horizon of  the event) must remain central to any meaningful

 interpretation.  This is why the artist's  intention must move to the back

of the bus for awhile (for ever?)

 

 Godard has known this since the start.  Have you

seen the book on Godard that the Museum of Modern Art put out?

"Son+Image  1974-1991"  The essay by Jean-Louis Leutrat is important as is

the Deleuze.

 

----

To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L

in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2