SCREEN-L Archives

November 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Frank <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Nov 1995 20:31:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
in general could not agree with tony williams more when he says that the
issue of authorship needs lots of careful discussion in what he calls the
"post barthes" era . . . and my own posting was not at all aimed at
authorship [or even at such notions as "the cinema of nicholas ray"--a notion
that seems to me very serviceable] . . . it was aimed ONLY at authors
understood as persons as opposed to authors [or authorship] understood as
something inferred from texts . . .
 
. . . this is hardly a post-structuralist, or post-modern, or post-anything
else notion . . . it goes back at least to lawrence's "trust the tale, not
the teller" and proabably a good deal before, although no earlier example
comes to mind just now . . .
  if you wanna know what nick ray had to say in his movies, watch the movies
. . . and if you wanna know what he had to say in his life read about his
life, but then you're not doing cinema-studies/criticism/textual-analysis or
anything like it anymore
 
mike frank
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2