SCREEN-L Archives

November 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 8 Nov 1995 10:00:43 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Neil, look at Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse
in the Age of Show Business, Marshall McLuhan's Understanding Media,
Walter Ong's Orality and Lliteracy, and Susan Sontag's On Photography.
Susan Kelly
 
On Mon, 6 Nov 1995, Neil Pollock wrote:
 
>      The next Industry Event at the Australian Film TV & Radio School is
>      going to look at the relationship between the 'word', the 'idea' and
>      visual representation - with particular reference to popular visual
>      culture.
>
>      The premise to be tested is this: WHY ISN'T TELEVISION GENERALLY
>      PERCEIVED TO BE AN APPROPRIATE VEHICLE FOR IDEAS?  Why are the realms
>      of the written (published) or spoken (radio) word seen to be the more
>      obvious, comfortable places for ideas?
>
>      Think of popular culture & you get - TV, cinema, comix, pornography
>      (if visual; erotica if written).  It feels as if unless the word is a
>      'womanword' like gossip, babble, chatter etc etc, the word is valued
>      more highly than the visual.
>
>      Compare the televisual treatment of news and current affairs; e.g. CNN
>      vs Australian Broadcasting Corporation's News Radio.
>
>      Is this because western European culture has always been very wedded
>      to the notion of the visual, in fact, as Plato's Cave points out, a
>      PICTURE IS only a picture and NOT THE REAL THING.
>
>      And what are the implications of this for Australia, with an
>      indigenous culture that has no history of the written word, but with
>      a strong tradition of oral and visual representation.
>
>      I would think my first port of call would be Walter Benjamin - to
>      explore the differences between writing & visual literacy & what the
>      implications of this are for social & political questions about seeing
>      and thinking.
>
>      But where to next??????
>
>      ANY ASSISTANCE TO POINT US IN APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS FOR READING/
>      UNDERSTANDING would be greatly appreciated.
>
>      Neil Pollock
>      Library Manager
>
>      on behalf of
>      Jane Mills
>      Head of Screen Studies
>
>      AFTRS
>
> ----
> To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
> in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
>
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2