SCREEN-L Archives

September 1995, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthew Mah <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Sep 1995 12:51:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
 > What happens with the narrator in film? Can we accept the camera as
 > a
 > narrator? (in comparison to the narrator in literary works)I am
 > thinking
 > particularly about those films, like The Age of Innocence, where you
 > have a
 > narrator throughout the whole film.
 
I wouldn't consider the camera a narrator.  If you've gone far enough into
studying narrators, you'll recall things like intrusive narration, telescoping
narration and the lot.  In all I think there are 5.  This is what narration is,
it tells a certain side of the story.  Narrators are always biased in no matter
what medium.  The tone of the voice, the relationship between the narrator and
the character.  However, we have the camera.  The camera captures everything,
and we have to assume that it is non-biased.  We have no way of confirming
this, as we do in narration, so we have to accept it.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2