Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 9 Aug 1995 19:37:50 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Mike Frank,
The statement by the Society for Cinema Studies Task Force on
Film Integrity (with authorship by John Belton et al.) is in Cinema
Journal, 30, no. 4 (Summer 1991), 3-6. It was criticized by Bill Nichols
and Royal Brown in CJ, 31, no. 4 (Summer 1992), 60-72, with replies by
Belton. I don't think it is any definitive position by SCS although it
does encourage certain practices.
Personally, however, I need a version of the film that is
"authentic" and that might mean I need a laserdisk or video tape more
than a corrupted 16mm print. While I wish the 16mm business was
functioning as it should, it isn't. I don't need to rehearse here,
however, all the issues adequately discussed in the original statment and
responses.
Janet Staiger, Department of Radio-TV-Film, U of Texas-Austin
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]
|
|
|