SCREEN-L Archives

August 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mark C. Pizzato 962-5883" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Aug 1995 10:21:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
RE: Part/Whole Films
 
In response to Gene's beautiful diatribe against the "aesthetic loss" I'd put
"aside," and to Janet's suggestion about a "lab," I thank you both for two
extreme answers to my question: one highly idealistic, the other simple and
practical. I like them both.
 
However, as someone who has taught literature, theater, and film, I'm still
curious about a comparison of these three arts, regarding pedagogy. Do we help
to create a movie theater-like experience if we show an entire film (even if
merely on video) to an entire class? Is there a crucial value to that
experience, and a value in discussing it in class, even though many of us seem
to have less and less class time, with shortened semesters and commuter
students?
 
When I teach film, I often pick works that have been adapted from novels or
plays. So, I ask my students to read the original text, along with some rather
heavy theoretical essays. It becomes difficult then to also ask them to spend
their "homework" time finding and watching films on video outside of class.
Yet, beyond that practical problem, I'm also torn between two ideals: film
(especially on video) as a "text" like a novel that a student might be assigned
to "read" in an individual way outside class--or film as performance requiring a
communal experience of audience participating in the live, co-creative diegesis,
even if what's onscreen is not "live."
 
Perhaps the "lab" or group viewing and reporting assignments helps to give both
experiences--with small groups of students viewing films on video outside class.
 But it seems to me that holding a video cassette in one's hand and "paging"
through it with fast forward or reverse (once it's in the VCR) is a very
different aesthetic experience than submitting to an active spectatorial
communion with the screen. Shouldn't film classes give something of both
(though to varying degrees, depending on the course): both the textual,
individualistic reading of film/video and the theatrical, communal watching?
Especially if the latter is being lost more in more in our postmodern era, with
video remote controls and TV channel switching and smaller multiplex cinemas?
(Of course, the reading of texts in the traditional sense is being lost, too,
which is why I try to make that tie in class and out.)
 
Any further suggestions, diatribes, idea(l)s?
 
Mark Pizzato
Univ. of St. Thomas
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2