SCREEN-L Archives

June 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tony Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Jun 1995 11:40:54 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
From: Tony Williams
English
SIUC
 The thoughts on this subject presented so far by Don, Tim Garrand, and Gene
Stavis (especially the last) are very much to the point. Of course, in an
ideal world, film (especially 35mm) would represent perfection itself for
the classroom. But this is not an ideal world and higher education is under
economic attack, particularly in this era of downsizing, with administrators
eagerly searching for reasons to eliminate "expensive" courses. Film rentals
are high and the system is not as good as it once was for reasons already
stated.
 Hence the main argument is economic, something the more privileged members
of that SCS Committee failed to realize. In many ways, most of them are
"spoiled" in terms of resources and following their arguments to the logical
conclusions would mean a return to the bad old days of film courses only
being available to the privileged few in prestigious locations.
  16mm rental is now seriously declining. In addition to the opportunities,
presented by laserdisc, many films are now only available on video. Think of
TNT's restored version of the 1932 DR. Jekyll and Mr Hyde as well as the
many examples of national cinema, independent film, and experimental work
only available on video.
   Film may thus eventually become one of a number of ways in which to
view cinema. This is a sign of the times and castigating less fortunate
and less privileged academics as "villains" does not help matters at all.
Hopefully, as technology develops both video and laserdisc formats should
improve. It is better seeing a film on video or laserdisc than not at all -
which is definitely the case in terms of the current richness of Hong Kong
Cinema for those of us not living in large cities.
  The issue is complex and in need of further discussion. But filmis certainly
now going to become one of the many different ways in which to view and
mourning about the "good old days" of rental availability is less helpful
than thinking about the future and how our economically viable means of
cinematic presentation could be improved and developed.
          Tony Williams.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2