SCREEN-L Archives

June 1995, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
liz weis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Jun 1995 23:35:25 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
In reply to Don Larsson on The Conversation's "He kill _us_ if he
got a chance"...yes I think the point is parallel to Blow-up, about
the subjectivity of interpretation, this time of sound rather than
image. But on a more practical note I spent several days interviewing editor
Murch and the sound editor of The Conversation. The sound editor told
me that the change in accentuation was an unplanned variation created
during the looping session. The editors used it--though they were afraid
it was gimicky --because they couldn't think of a clearer way of
explaining Caul's new interpretation to the audience. liz weis
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2