SCREEN-L Archives

May 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Murray Pomerance <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 28 May 1995 11:04:54 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<v02110102abed44cad319@[128.174.23.78]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
I saw it once.  I remember enjoying it well enough, though some of the
marital scenes between Sutherland and (Burstyn?) were tiring.  But what I
thought was marvelous--indeed, worth the admission--was the moment when
Fellini is encountered editing.  That moment said more about filmmaking,
more about art, more about ego, than many other films put together.
Fellini says, "Sorry, I am WORKING," and we actually see him, just
before, intensely and devotedly lost in that work.  Filmmaking isn't the
egotistical self-indulgence much of Hollywood would have us believe.  At
least, not when it's being done by such as Fellini.  The sense of
concentration we see him display over that cutter's shoulder; his
abruptness at the door; the focus of his love onto the film project,
rather than onto the passerby; are all missing in Alex, and THAT is why
Alex isn't making another film.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2