SCREEN-L Archives

May 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Murray Pomerance <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 28 May 1995 08:37:01 CDT
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
How funny--and depressing--that you should write about Kauffmann.  Back
in the late 1960s I thought about him what you write now, and almost 30
years later things have hardly changed!  He is a fine critic, I think,
but I don't read him these days.  Why do you suppose we haven't produced
a bevy of young, intelligent, articulate and readable critics.  We *have*
produced some young filmmakers.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2