SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 Mar 1995 10:49:36 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Ulf Dalquist wrote:
>I'm amazed to find this on SCREEN-L. No discussion of identification processes.
>Nothing about perception analysis. Not a word about the difference between the
>funcions of violence in for instance action films and horror films. No analysis
>of underlying norms, values and moral motives in the depiction of violence. No
>nothing exept an equalization between screen violence and real violence. As I
>said, I'm amazed.
 
Here's a clue, Ulf: I'm not an academic.
 
However, I'm quite certain all those questions have been analyzed ad nauseum.
The violence continues to spread unchecked. Just why do YOU suppose that
firearms have acquired such a mystique in America that everyone has to own
at least six or seven, including an assault rifle, and a couple of pocket
pistols
to pack when grocery shopping (a slight exaggeration...)?
 
 
 
David Smith
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2