SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Emily Zants <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Mar 1995 15:38:10 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Then they shouldn't have lent their names to the project for the initial
announcement in a public forum!  We wouldn't, perhaps, have responded.
Where does responsibility start?
 
On Wed, 15 Mar 1995 [log in to unmask] wrote:
 
> First, the publication project for which
> these people submitted proposals has no connection to the Literature/
> Film Quarterly.. . .  There is no basis for calling it irresponsible.
> Secondly, Jim Welsh was not the person designated to receive or respond
> to the book proposals.  At the time all this was going on he was in fact
> teaching in eastern Europe.
>
> Making accusations against the wrong people is certainly irresponsible
> and all the more regrettable when it's done in a public forum.
>
> Kathryn Kalmanson
> [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2