SCREEN-L Archives

January 1995, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Desser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Jan 1995 20:04:35 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
The best filmic example of the realist/resemblance debate in the cinema can
be found in the Marx Bros. (of course) DUCK SOUP.  When, at one point Rufus
T. Firefly/Groucho asks Harpo, "Who are you," Harpo "respoonds" by rolling
up his sleeve to reveal a tattoo/picture of himself.
 
DD
 
>Original comment:
>
>>Consider:  What are the implications of people saying "This is my
>>mother" when displaying a snapshot of a woman?  Clearly the small piece
>>of paper is not literally "mother."  But for the purposes at hand
>>one can elide the middle words in the sentence "This is a picture of
>>my mother."
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Cal Pryluck, Radio-Television-Film, Temple University, Philadelphia
>><[log in to unmask]>  <[log in to unmask]>
>
>Not that this doesn't remain a good question, but haven't the implications
>of this elision been discussed at length for years, by Bazin, Sontag,
>Barthes, and more recently John Tagg, Joel Snyder, and Norman Bryson?  This
>is the question at the heart of every realist/resemblance debate in
>photography criticism.
 
_____________________________________
David Desser,UIUC Cinema Studies
2109 FLB/707 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL  61801
217/244-2705

ATOM RSS1 RSS2