SCREEN-L Archives

January 1995, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ulf Dalquist <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Jan 1995 14:45:37 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Thank you everybody who contributed to my enlighment on the question of the art
of stating running times. Shoulda thought of that myself. Guess I have to blame
the metric system for that (it's living hell calculating film length in
meters/minutes).
 
Anyway here`s another one of those annoying trivia questions. Correct me if I'm
wrong, but i got it this way:
NTSC video runs at 24 fps, but are just using 400 lines on the TV.
PAL video runs at 25 fps (resulting in a running time 4% shorter than the 35 mm
edition) and uses 425 lines on the TV.
 
Why?
 
Has it got something to do with the difference between the US & the European
electricity system (60 hz compared to 50 hz?
 
Cheers,
 
Ulf
Ulf Dalquist Phone: +46 46 104266
Dept. of Sociology Fax: +46 46 104794
Box 114 221 00 Lund SWEDEN E-mail: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2