SCREEN-L Archives

January 1995, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jan 1995 11:00:22 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
Liz Weis writes:
"The Sharp was highest rated among those video projectors that needn't
be detailed enough to handle computer information in a survey conducted
by a professional audio-visual magazine.  Its downside is that it
doesn't adjust for keystone problems which arise if you do not
project from the same height as the screen.  The big advantage of the
sharp is more lumens."
 
My catalogue also lists a new Sharp projector that can handle computer
information as well, but it's *much* more expensive  ($9,000!).
 
--Don Larsson, Mankato State U., MN

ATOM RSS1 RSS2