SCREEN-L Archives

December 1994, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Luke Delwiche <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Dec 1994 02:20:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
>Thanks, but maybe I should have been more specific.  I've checked out
>Schatz, Solomon, Kaminsky, but I find them all tautological. And Grant
>and Altman and Neale, but they all tend to fall into the same traps.
>Maybe I'm just getting last minute jitters abou this paper on film genre
>theory (and have been readin too much Bordwell).
>
>arthur
 
READING TOO MUCH BORDWELL!?!?!?!
 
Is that possible?
 
Also I thought Altman pretty much hit it on the head, but as always this is
open to discussion...
 
What do you mean that the above authors are too tautological/fall into
traps? I must admit I do not understand....
 
LUKE
 
 __________________________________________________________________________
| |
| Luke T. Delwiche internet: [log in to unmask] |
| fax: (608)264-2200 |
|__________________________________________________________________________|

ATOM RSS1 RSS2