SCREEN-L Archives

November 1994, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen O'Riordan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Nov 1994 12:30:40 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>""In my research on silent cinema I found very little written on the
>subject of movement (objects within the frame, camera, movement created
>by editing etc.) in Western scholarship. Closely connected issues of
>tempo and rhythm also received little attention. My problem is mainly
>methodological: How does one account for movement, tempo and rhythm in
>the analysis of film style?""
>
>Try Bela Balazs' "Theory of The Film" and "The Close-up and The Face of Man",
>Mearleau-Ponty's "Cinema and The New Psychology", and some essays by Hugo
>Munsterberg's "Photoplay: a Psychologycal Study".
>
>Regards,
>
>- Claudio Fernandes - [log in to unmask]
>
>                    *             *               *
Claudio,
There is a nice article on movement in Oct.1994 Sight & Sound by Richard
Dryer. It is focused on the film "Speed". As a nice counterpoint to the
Dryer article is one by Simon Louvish on Speed & the Silents, in the same issue.
Stephen
 
Stephen O'Riordan
Film/Video Archives
Media Center, UCSD
9500 Gilman Dr.
La Jolla, CA  92093-0504
Tel: 619/534-7981  Fax:  619/534-7180
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2