SCREEN-L Archives

November 1994, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Tichenor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Nov 1994 19:28:05 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
>Simply because of the huge volume of material, I'm sure there's more
>right than wrong in The Motion Picture Guide.  I'd be interested in
>knowing whether the material published in the book edition and its
>yearbook-updates has been revised for CD-ROM, or if it's all simply
>been digitized and reconfigured for electronic reading.
>
>Perhaps James might take it on himself to look up Greenberg's review,
>use it as a basis for a little test, and offer a little more critical
>review as part of the Consumer Reports corner of SCREEN-L.
>
>Blaine Allan                           [log in to unmask]
 
 
Yes, I will try to find the FQ article and am willing to do a thorough
test of the disc. I have found some mistakes, and the critisim is not
fourth year film dissection. But (sadly) compared to what is available,
it's the best around.
 
But I will look into and use it some more :-)
 
James

ATOM RSS1 RSS2