SCREEN-L Archives

October 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 31 Oct 1994 23:47:26 EST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Mon, 31 Oct 1994 14:19:00 PST from <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On Mon, 31 Oct 1994 14:19:00 PST James Tichenor said:
 
>Can you all deny that there was a massive change in around 1963, that the
>very form changed, the very style? I know there is a major difference in
>style and it is that that interests me. I don't want to group movies or
>films, but one has to start from somewhere.
 
This would be a more persuasive proposition if it included a few reference
films to illustrate the "massive change" and "major difference."  Sometimes
intuitive statements such as these turn out to be defensible; but they are
difficult to argue against in the absence of some evidence.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Cal Pryluck, Radio-Television-Film, Temple University, Philadelphia
<[log in to unmask]>  <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2