Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jul 1994 11:10:06 U |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mail*Link(r) SMTP RE>Re[3: True Lies
>>We spend our entertainment buck to be entertained. If we're
>>exposed to political messages (and yes, I'm familiar with the
>>argument that ALL discourse is political, though I have a problem
>>figuring out what that little Deer X-ing sign REALLY means at its
>>political core), then they're often subtle enough to be completely
>>missed.
>>A friend recently overheard two little old ladies describing "Thelma
>>and Louise." Their opinion was that it was a "sweet little movie about
>>about a couple of girls who had some adventures, got into some kind
>>of trouble, and then held hands and jumped over the Grand Canyon."
>>So even the MOST political subtexts, it seems, are often missed. I
>>just think we too often ring the alarm bells, since we're the kinds
>>of folks who make a living by looking for socio-political messages
>>on cereal boxes. (Ever noticed the Trix rabbit is WHITE? Just
>>imagine what that does subconciously to children of color|)
>>Denise Bryson, Language and Literature
>>[log in to unmask]
Denise,
I heartily agree with you. Movies are foremost entertainment. Any effort to
educate or extract a response beyond enjoyment is secondary. I posted a
similar opinion on CINEMA-L and got shot down for it too.
Guy
|
|
|