SCREEN-L Archives

July 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"D. S. Cunningham" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jul 1994 21:08:41 PDT
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Mon, 25 Jul 1994 18:38:00 CST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
to Marlyn
 
ahhhhhhhhh, but your question *does* have something to do with OJ--his
LAWYERS are the epitome of manipulative mouthpieces--not that LA's
prosecutors seem any less so--
 
but to your question--most of the films I could think of want to have it BOTH
ways--good lawyers vs bad ie, CLASS ACTION, THE VERDICT, MUSIC BOX,
STORYVILLE,THE FIRM, PELICAN BRIEF (good law student, anyway). Of course
there's no redeeming CITIZEN COHN.
 
Hmmmmmmm, thought provoking. I'll be interested to see what others come up
with.
 
Donna Cunningham
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2