SCREEN-L Archives

April 1994


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Patrick B Bjork <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 8 Apr 1994 23:42:25 -0500
text/plain (38 lines)
On Fri, 8 Apr 1994, Robert Withers wrote:
> This is a voice against making screen-l a usenet conference. I originally
> checked out film-l and cinema-l and found them big timewasters, with lots of
> fannish chit-chat. I think on those lists someone mentioned screen-l, and on
> screen-l someone mentioned h-film, and I took the little bit of extra trouble
> to subscribe. I find the discussions here at a much higher level, with lots
> of useful information and many thoughtful insights shared. I think this would
> possibly degenerate pretty quickly as a usenet conference. The average user
> checking out usenet would have no basis for understanding a different
> character belonging to the cinema, film, screen lists, and I'm afraid they
> would all homogenize.
> Screen-l seems to have a fairly broadbased, international group of
> Has this developed simply by word of screen, and through those brave enough to
> search the list of lists?
> If screen-l were a usenet conference, I gather netters who don't have access
> to usenet would still be able to access sceen-l via e-mail, as now?
> Regards,
> Robert
> Robert Withers
> Film Department
> Brooklyn College
> Brooklyn, New York 11210 Bitnet: [log in to unmask]
> (718) 951-5664 Internet: [log in to unmask]
I agree completely with Mr. Withers. I lurk on usenet from time to time
and there is definitely some serious drivel occurring there.
Patrick Bjork
Bismarck State College
[log in to unmask]