SCREEN-L Archives

November 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Nov 1993 15:49:00 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
                      E L E C T R O N I C   M E S S A G E
 
                                        Date:     22-Nov-1993 03:14pm EST
                                        From:     Stephen Hart
                                                  HARTS2
                                        Level:    Post-secondary/University
                                        Tel No:   904-644-4839
 
TO:  Remote Addressee                     ( _jnet%screen-l@ua1vm )
 
 
Subject: What's Up, Doc?
 
Felicia Berke mentioned _What's Up, Doc?_ as a film with a scientist.  I
have a problem with that.  Ryan O'Neil's character was a musicologist, and
his discipline would be "the scholarly study of music" (cf. Harvard
Dictionary of Music, 2nd ed.).  Though the ends of such study would relate
to music, it would not exclude studies in physical and natural sciences in
certain topics.  Still, a musicologist is not a scientist in the sense of
the ones mentioned so far.  What do you all think?  Am I correct in my
thinking or am I being too anal?  My co-worker is a doctoral student in
ethnomusicology.  When she gets back, I'll talk to her and let you know
what she thinks.
 
Stephen Hart, Florida State Univ. (10-1; wish it were 11-0, but that's
life!)
HARTS2@firnvx

ATOM RSS1 RSS2