*

* I don't understand what you mean when you say a "CEO ... should not be

* responsibel for the effects on the people who work for it."  I think

* you fail to see the point of the film.    The ultimate responsibilty

* of the corporation is to its workers.  When a multinational corporation

* grows so large that it can no longer fulfill the resoponsibility it

* has to the workers and towns who have devoted their lives to it, then

* it should be criticized.

* Moore was not trying to place all of the blame on Roger Smith.  Smith

* only represented the patriarchal system of corporate management which

* is capable of destroying its worker's lives and security.

*

Sarcasm. Sarcasm. Sarcasm.

And I think Smith, as the head of the system Moore wanted to criticize, was

intentionally made to bear the brunt of the blame for Flint's troubles.

(That part not sarcasm)

 

 

--

Mark Bunster                      |  Hassan Chop! mersh is available!

Survey Research Lab--VCU          |  cassettes, shirts, stickers, etc.

Richmond, VA 23220                |You'll never see a fish head in an

[log in to unmask]            |Italian restaurant, drinking

(804) ELK-O-COP                   |Cappucino with an Oriental woman.