SCREEN-L Archives

October 1991

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cal Pryluck <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Oct 1991 23:23:44 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
My answer is about like Sandra Basgall's earlier answer.  The "Times" and
"Variety" reviews are useful if available. I also depend on other sources
readily available in the United States. Most useful, I think, are the
contemporaneous reviews published in the periodicals cited in the biblio-
graphic volumes "The Readers Guide." For me the whole point to the exercise
is to get a sense of what people were exposed at the time the films were
released and "Readers Guide," by definition of their mission, catalogs mass
circulation periodicals.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2