SCREEN-L Archives

March 2014, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cynthia Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:45:19 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
CALL FOR PAPERS
CFP: The Golden Age(s) of Documentaries
An area of multiple panels for the 2014 Film & History Conference:
Golden Ages: Styles and Personalities, Genres and Histories
October 29-November 2, 2014
The Madison Concourse Hotel and Governor’s Club
Madison, WI (USA)
DEADLINE for abstracts: June 1, 2014

AREA: The Golden Age of Documentaries

One constant throughout the history of documentary has been the quest for, or a claim to, a higher truth or authenticity.  Yet, ever since John Grierson coined the term “documentary” in 1926, there has been no easy consensus as to what defines the genre.  Robert Flaherty’s Nanook of the North (1922) is often cited as the “first” documentary, leading many to interpret that the genre’s sine qua non is a pronounced ethnographic or cultural thrust. 

Over time, the quest for authenticity has validated the use of numerous techniques, such as dispensing with scripts, or directorial subterfuge to provoke the subject into revealing his or her true self.  These techniques, of course, are at the core of the cinema direct and cinema verité movements of the 1950s and ‘60s—an era that is a prime candidate for the Golden Age of Documentary. 

Leading into the 21st century, documentaries have been increasingly characterized by hybridity and an infusion of fictive narrative techniques. How do these developments affect our understanding of documentary and “the real”?  How have our understandings of documentary “truth” evolved over time? 

This area invites 20-minute papers examining a variety of questions, themes, styles, and filmmakers associated with documentary film, from the Lumière Brothers factory film (1895) through breakout art house features such as Muscle Shoals (2013), nature blockbusters such as Wonders of the Arctic 3D (2014), and documentary shorts and online films, such as Mr. Christmas (2013)
.  
Possible panel topics include, but are not limited to:

•	The nature of cinematic truth(s) in documentary filmmaking (close readings, comparative studies, truth-making strategies in a range of historical periods
•	The impact of technological advances on communicating authenticity
•	The television news documentary:  Edward R. Murrow’s and Fred Friendly’s See it Now and CBS Reports, NBC’s White Paper, and ABC’s Close-Up, and the National Film Board of Canada’s The Candid Eye
•	The work of such filmmakers as Dziga Vertov (and Kino-Pravda), Robert Flaherty, Wolf Koening, Jean Rouch, Albert and David Maysles, Robert Drew and Richard Leacock, and D.A. Pennebaker
•	The rise of the internet documentary

Proposals for complete panels (three related presentations) are also welcome, but they must include an abstract and contact information, including an e-mail address, for each presenter. For updates and registration information about the upcoming meeting, see the Film & History website (www.filmandhistory.org).

Please e-mail your 200-word proposal by 1 June 2014, to the area chair:

Tony Osborne
Gonzaga University
[log in to unmask]

----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
University of Alabama: http://www.tcf.ua.edu

ATOM RSS1 RSS2