SCREEN-L Archives

July 2013, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Katarzyna Marciniak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:29:51 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (126 lines)
Call for Papers

TEACHING TRANSNATIONAL CINEMA AND MEDIA: POLITICS AND PEDAGOGY
Edited Collection
Co-editors: Bruce Bennett (Lancaster University,
UK) and Katarzyna Marciniak (Ohio University, USA)


This proposed edited collection will focus on the
analysis of transnational cinema (also referred
to in different contexts as “border cinema,”
“cinema of migration,” or “cinema of
displacement”) in conjunction with specific
pedagogical challenges such cinema/media evoke in
the classroom. Coming to the foreground in the
early 2000s, the rubric of transnational cinema
has galvanized film and media studies, drawing
our attention to diasporic and “accented”
filmmaking (Naficy), but also challenging us to
think about cinema beyond the restrictive scope
of the nation. For various reasons, since 2000
there has emerged a rich archive of new films
that exemplify transnational cinema. Examples
from around the globe include, for instance,
Amreeka (2009), Babel (2006), Before Night Falls
(2000), Biutiful (2010), Children in No Man’s
Land (2008), Dirty Pretty Things (2002), The
Gatekeeper (2002), Gran Torino (2008), Goodbye
Lenin (2003), In This World (2002), Last Resort
(2000), Machete (2010), Paradise Now (2005),
Persepolis (2007), Silent Waters (2003), Sleep
Dealer (2008), The Syrian Bride (2004), The
Visitor (2007), or Unveiled (2005). Collectively,
these films engage with issues related to
immigrant identities, transnational encounters,
foreignness and citizenship, the politics of
visibility, terrorism, legality, race and racism.
National borders emerge in these films as both
violent geopolitical constructs and abstractions
related to ideas of difference, otherness,
travel, migration, neo-liberal capitalism,
neo-colonialism and transcultural translation.

As the field of transnational cinema and media
studies has been developing, scholars of cinema
and media have not thus far turned their
systematic attention to pedagogical practices.
Discussions of teaching practices occur but they
are mainly located in the fields of rhetoric,
education and communication, or, occasionally, in
gender studies. As more film scholars engage with
transnational cinema in the classroom, our goal
is to explore the complexities of teaching with
and about such cinema, addressing such questions
as: What happens when our students encounter the
“foreignness” of various films, texts, and ideas
in the classroom? How might teachers make the
topics raised in transnational texts – national
(un)belonging, racial tensions, cross-cultural
encounters, difference, intimacy and family, the
politics of anger – relevant, even urgent, to our
students, a lot of whom have not knowingly
brushed against experiences of immigration and
foreignness? How do we avoid “consumerist”
emotionality in teaching such complex topics? How
might one implicate “the local” in “the global”
and encourage students to see beyond their own
borders of social and cultural contexts? How
might we imbricate the transnational into one’s
pedagogical practices so that issues of
foreignness, migration, and dislocation begin to
produce what we call “affective openings,” that
is, an openness toward new ways of thinking about
resistance to oppressive forms of phobic
nationalisms and exclusionary practices of citizenship?

We hope to include a variety of theoretical
perspectives from scholars with experience of
teaching in diverse locations. We invite
contributions that consider innovative pedagogies
and think critically about such embodied
experiences as spectatorial identification or
disidentification and estrangement, spectatorial
consumption of foreignness and “otherness,”
culturally-mediated desire for “proper”
representations of immigration, migration, or
foreignness, or what Elspeth Probyn calls
“affective reactions” in the classroom and their
“management.” We also invite contributions that
reflect upon the value of transnational cinema as
educational tool or ‘weapon’ (Solanas and
Getino), and the institutional politics of
teaching and working in this area within
universities and colleges in an increasingly
neo-liberal global context and in the face of the
“post-ideological” turn in many arts, humanities
and social science disciplines.

Please submit a 500-word abstract and a short bio
by September 15, 2013 to Bruce Bennett
(<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask])
and Katarzyna Marciniak (<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]).

Bruce Bennett
Director of Film Studies
Lancaster Institute of Contemporary Arts
Lancaster University
LA1 4YW

Katarzyna Marciniak
Professor and Co-Editor of Global Cinema
Transnational Studies
Department of English
Ohio University
Athens, OH 45701





   

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2