SCREEN-L Archives

July 2008, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Darrell Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:57:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (152 lines)
Lou,

For that matter, I surely wish there were more film critics of color.
When I scan the roster AAFCA it’s amazing how few black national film
critics there are, with the obvious exception of Elvis Mitchell and
Stephanie A. Frederic of BET Television. Most others are relegated to
local TV stations, radio and the internet. 

While there’s no guarantee that these “black eyes” would provide any
better analysis that a white critic, there is surely a vested interest
in seeing more diverse representations of blacks - and other Others - in
film.


Darrell M. Newton, Ph.D.
Associate Professor,
The Department of Communication Arts
Salisbury University
269 Fulton Hall
Salisbury, MD 21801
(410) 677-5060 Office
(410) 543-6229 Department

http://faculty.salisbury.edu/~dmnewton/
>>> Lou Thompson <[log in to unmask]> 07/27/08 5:34 PM >>>
Thanks to all of your for your thoughtful responses.  I hope to read
more!

What I have been thinking about is how few women are film critics,
something 
I've always wondered (and it was tough to break into film scholarship as
a 
woman too, in my experience), but recently there have been some films
that 
got pretty universal critical acclaim but that I found appalling because
of 
their not-so-subtle sexism. I have pretty much determined that those
films 
were liked because they are being reviewed by men who don't see anything

wrong with sexism (and I'm not saying all men are like that, just most
male 
film critics that I've read)--in fact, they don't even notice it.

For example, take the film "Waitress."  I should warn you that spoilers 
follow.

I had heard great things--nothing but great things, in fact, about this 
film.  When I saw it my first reaction was one of disappointment, mostly
for 
the stereotyping of Southern characters and also that the so-called 
"cleverness" of the whole pie recipe story was kind of a joke--none of
these 
recipes were original, they were just given "cute" names.

But as I got further into the film I was really disturbed by the fact
that 
all the women were subservient to men, that the protagonist was having
an 
affair that was three times inappropriate (she was married, he was
married, 
and he was her doctor!), and she is  saved only by a lecherous old rich
guy 
who dies at a convenient time.  And the doctor was rejecting his
perfectly 
lovely, pleasant, physician wife in favor of a waitress who was in an 
abusive relationship but fed him pie.

There have been quite a few films like that lately.  I'll admit that
even my 
female students like these films, just as they don't see the problems I
have 
with "Pretty Woman" or "Love, Actually" (again for my feminist
ideology), 
but they're young and unschooled, and so I wish critics would look a
little 
more closely at the ideological assumptions that these films perpetuate,

since most filmgoers obviously do not.

If we had more educated women reviewing films, I think that might
change.

Not that I want to do it, though.

Lou


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Holiday, Frederick N." <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [SCREEN-L] film critics


>I don't really have a list if the best, but I know who the absolute
worst 
>is:  Peter Travers of ROLLING STONE, without a doubt.
>
> Fred A. Holliday II
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Film and TV Studies Discussion List [[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf 
> Of Lou Thompson [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:12 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [SCREEN-L] film critics
>
> The announcement today that "Ebert and Roeper" were going off the air
came 
> at one of those serendipitous times for me, as I've been thinking a
lot 
> about film critics--who they are, where they come from, how (or if)
they 
> are trained or schooled.
>
> I was wondering if those of you on the list would be interested in
sharing 
> your list of the top film critics/> Professor of English
> Texas Woman's University
> _____________________________
>
> "One Law for the Lion and the Ox is Oppression."--William Blake
> _____________________________
>
> "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do 
> nothing."--Attributed to
> Edmund Burke
> _____________________________
>
> "It could be worse.  I could be Sting."--Ozzy Osbourne
> _____________________________
>
> ----
> Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
> http://www.ScreenSite.org
>
> ----
> Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
> http://www.ScreenSite.org
> 

----
Learn to speak like a film/TV professor! Listen to the ScreenLex
podcast:
http://www.screenlex.org

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2