Timothy Shary writes:
>I always tell my students that screenings for film courses should be
>considered the same as labs for science courses-- they are required
>in order to learn the material.
I've tried that, but found that it just doesn't work. The widespread
availability of most films on VHS or DVD coupled with the fact that
most students (at my institution, at least) are focused purely and
simply on passing the assessments and have no interest whatsoever in
the subject beyond that, means that they simply don't show up to
organised screenings. Another barrier (which is common in a lot of
UK institutions) is that teaching sessions are timetabled in one-hour
blocks, and it's very difficult to book a lecture theatre for longer
than that. The only other option is Wednesday afternoons, when
there's no scheduled teaching: but we are strictly forbidden from
putting on compulsory sessions relating to undergrad taught modules,
mainly because the Students' Union insists on this, believing that
it's more important for them to be playing sports, doing part-time
jobs (understandable, given the economic climate of HE nowadays) or
drinking themselves to oblivion in the bar.
Last year I was even vetoed from screening a 35mm archive print of a
film that is not available on any form of retail video, unless I gave
an undertaking that it wouldn't be mentioned in any of the essay or
exam questions. This was because the only possible slot for the
session would have been a Wednesday afternoon, and I can't organise
sessions on a Wednesday afternoon which are anything other than
optional, i.e. over and above the course requirements. If I'd
screened the film on that basis, about three students would have shown up.
>The only instance other than illness (or family crisis, etc.) when I
>excuse students from screenings is when they tell me the content of
>a film will upset them, which is rare.
I absolutely refuse to do this under any circumstances. In the first
session of my 'Archiving the Media' module, and in the information
which students have when they're deciding their final year module
choices, I make it clear that in this one they will be shown (for
example) concentration camp footage, extremist propaganda from both
left and right, a home movie which shows a public guillotining and
hard core porn. If they're not willing to deal with that, they
shouldn't be taking the module. These people are adults, not
children: and the ability to produce a rational and considered
response to emotionally and/or ideologically problematic material
should be a core skill for any graduate in a humanities or social
sciences discipline, IMHO. If they've got personal issues which
prevent them from being able to make such a response, they should go
and do a degree in electrical engineering.
Leo
Dr. Leo Enticknap
Curator, Northern Region Film & Television Archive & Senior Lecturer
in Media Studies
School of Arts and Media
University of Teesside
Middlesbrough
TS1 3BA
Tel. +44 (0)1642 384049
Fax +44 (0)8712 249151
----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html
|