SCREEN-L Archives

October 2002, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hudson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:01:58 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
James Monaco wrote:

>Can anyone think of a remake that was more successful (artistically
>or financially) that its original?

Most recently, Ocean's 11.

Others... the 1978 remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Carpenter's The Thing. Hitchcock's 1956 The Man Who Knew Too Much over his own 1934 version. Cronenberg's The Fly, definitely.

But what do you do about essential texts and legends -- Shakespeare, say, or Dracula -- where you've got countless versions that may or may not be remakes, actually, but certainly take into account the films that have preceded them?


David Hudson
Editor, GreenCine
http://www.greencine.com

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2