SCREEN-L Archives

April 2001, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sandy Camargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:29:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
I can't think of an example off-hand, but the issue that Arnt is
investigating is made more complicated when one is seeing a movie with
subtitles, and dialogue that is meant to be whispered or inaudible is
subtitled and readable. Would this instance be including in your concerns,
Arnt?

Sandy Camargo

>>With extreme long-shots wouldn't even normal conversation (if recorded
>>naturalistically) be as inaudible as whispering?
>
>Of course, but I'm looking for scenes where everyday perception is
>'stretched', as in so many other cases in film. Little dialogue is
>recorded 'naturalistically' (cf. Altman 1992, for instance); even the
>'hushed' dialogue in loads of 'typical' Hollywood films, would be
>incomprehensible if experienced from the distance that the image
>'suggests', in everyday life, that is (which I find interesting, as
>it creates a very intimate/personal listening experience).
>
>Thanks, anyway, for good suggestions.
>
>Arnt
>
>----
>To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
>in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]



Sandy Camargo
Visiting Instructor
Department of English
University of Missouri

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2