SCREEN-L Archives

July 2003, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Fred A. Holliday II" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:14:42 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I have not seen the LAT article, nor am I advocating a position here. I'm
just curious about the following question:
In the formation of a film department's curriculum, where does one draw a
line between what the Professor's (who are better informed) think is important Vs
what the students (who after all are the financial basis of the department)
want to learn?
I hope that's clear.  I have no answer myself, and as a Ph.D. candidate my
allegiances are to both sides, so I'm just curious to see what listmembers
think.
Fred Holliday

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.ScreenSite.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2