SCREEN-L Archives

April 1995, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
hanemann <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Apr 1995 15:00:21 CDT
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 What difference does it make if you use four stars, five stars, or a one
to ten system, as long as you know the parameters ahead of time? Any
system is just a thumbnail reference. And who agrees with the critics all
the time anyway? On the other hand, maybe four stars are too few because
there isn't enough room to distinguish "great" movies from "classic movies.
                              Danny H.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2