SCREEN-L Archives

February 2002, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Timothy Shary <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:45:51 -0500
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (15 lines)
See Susan Faludi's extensive treatment of the film from a feminist
perspective in "Backlash".  I'm pretty sure her analysis of it in the book
is revised from an earlier article she published in Mother Jones.  And
Time magazine did an entire cover story on it at the end of 1987, which I
believe included some feminist perspectives in detail.  I'd also imagine
(but can't be sure) that Cineaste covered it, likely from a left-leaning
angle.  Good luck--

        Timothy Shary
        Clark University

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2