Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jun 1993 17:32:15 EDT |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Deborah Cameron asks how I felt about her quoting my remarks in her
summary of the issues surrounding the use of e-mail messages by other
commentators. I read down to the end before I realized that I was
being cited/quoted/paraphrased. My notions are more-or-less in the
area of common wisdom. Not everybody agrees with my version but those
who do could have said the same things I did.
If I had been actually quoted and cited, then I would expect permission
to have been requested. It's a subtle matter, I suppose. A little like
trying to get students to understand that common knowledge does not have
to be footnoted (e.g., Winston Churchill was a central figure in WWII).
Since in the matter of appropriate usage of e-mail we are all students,
we'll just have to muddle through until a latter-day Fowler comes along
and makes arguments so persuasive they are accepted by all.
Cal Pryluck, Radio-Television-Film, Temple University, Philadelphia
<[log in to unmask]> <PRYLUCK@TEMPLEVM>
|
|
|