SCREEN-L Archives

October 1992

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mark Bunster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Oct 1992 13:44:55 EDT
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>; from "[log in to unmask]" at Oct 21, 92 1:26 pm
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
> Subject: Northern Exposure
>
> Ok, OK, enough politics.  How many of you out there thought
> this past Monday's _Northern Exposure_ was exceptionally good?
> Count at least three votes from me and my co-workers!
> And, was that *really* Bob Seger at The Last Supper Club?
> No one here in the office paid attention to the credits to
> see if it was really him.
>
> Corinne
 
Actually, over here on the grunge list we were discussing how pathetic the
episode was compared to previous. Someone's told the producer/writers that
they're hip and now they're striving for the ultimate cool situation. Totally
goofy. The guy from last week's who was all into Einsturzende Neubaten was
really cool, but why for Adam Ant?
 
 
M o R

ATOM RSS1 RSS2