SCREEN-L Archives

December 1994, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
edwin jahiel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Dec 1994 22:05:15 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>Don Larson wrote:
>>
>>Arthur mentions British films as being more attuned to class issues.  There's
>>a new British film that won't get (comparatively) wide release until the
>>new year by Ken Loach about a woman who keeps having children, while the
>>state keeps taking them away.  Siskel and Ebert touted it highly last weekend,
>>but I'm afraid the title escapes me.
>>
>I might be mistaken, but I think it's called LADYBIRD, LADYBIRD.
>
>Ulf
 
It is, and it is also a very good film, with rancor against conditions
(well balanced) and Thatcherism, like so many other British movies which
seem to have taken over the torch from the earlier Angry Young Men.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2