SCREEN-L Archives

March 1996, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 21 Mar 1996 19:17:52 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>Meryem--wheels appear to spin backwards when photographed if they
>are spinning at less than 24 times a second (or a multiple of that).
>They would have to spin at exactly 24 times a second to appear to
>be stationary and faster to appear to go forward.  As for "persistence
>of vision," it is rather embarrassing to admit as a co-editor of a
>journal of that name, that that theory ofperception has been disproved as
>an adequate explanation of why we see film as moving, as has the psi
>phenomenon.
 
When we watch TV Persistence of vision comes in to play, but also the
phosphor on the picture tube has a persistence as that little beam sweeps
back and forth turning on and off at various spots of the screen. That's
why I would rather have light letters on a dark background, cheaper
electricity over the years and holds those little accelerated electrons
that fly out of the tubes into my upper organs to a minimun. Your CRT
should last longer too.
 
73, Uncle Art NE Pa.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2