Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 1994 17:19:24 CST |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>Diane McDaniel asks if there's a tv discussion list of this sort on the
>net. It was my impression that Screen-l is a "film and tv studies
>discussion list."
To which Shari Rosenblum responded by saying:
>I agree with Diane's underlying premise, however, that tv studies are
>absent from these discussions. I've interpreted the absence as
>manifestation of an unspoken taboo. I've hesitated to engage conversations
>on the topic, accordingly. Have I been mistaken?
Despite the growing body of critical studies RE: TV and video, most
discussions of television still seem to be relegated to a 2nd class status.
Therfore, what occurs on this list is no surprise. In many ways the
discourse here is mostly a refracted image of the discussions taking place
in the pages of The New York Times, Vanity Fair and People Magazine.
Fortunately, there have a been instances where the discussion has moved
beyond existing models.
Maybe these two previous postings represent a beginning of sorts. I hope so.
Allan
|
|
|