SCREEN-L Archives

February 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Mary C. Kalfatovic" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Feb 1994 03:28:58 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Why can't a non-English language movie win for Best Picture?  Good
question.  However, the way of the Academy is probably not a subject
deserving of much attention.  How do they decide what constitutes a
"supporting" role?  I think it has something to do with the actors
involved and also with the need to fill up nomination slots.  Wait...I
just said I wasn't going to speculate.  In response to the fellow in
Montreal who seems to think there is an Anglo-Saxon conspiracy: the Oscars
existed for twenty years before a British film won for Best Picture
(Olivier's HAMLET).  European directors have been a major influence on
American directors and vice versa.  Many of the top directors of
Hollywood's "Golden Era" were European (Wilder, Wyler, Curtiz, Lubitsch,
Sirk, Zinnemann).
 
Mary Kalfatovic, Washington, D.C.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2