SCREEN-L Archives

December 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dirk Eitzen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Dec 1993 15:27:37 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines)
According to my (rather old) Webster's Dictionary, 'modern' is a noun as
well as an adjective, as in "You old modern, you."  And people speak all
the time about the old and the new, not to mention the good, the bad, and
the ugly--even people who have never heard of Althusser.  So what's wrong
the 'the post-modern'?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2