SCREEN-L Archives

March 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Stephen Brophy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Mar 1994 08:25:16 EST
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Wed, 02 Mar 94 05:13:22 -0500. <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
  As the person who started this little tempest with a too-generally
worded message, I want to say that much of what has been posted in the
past few days about the ways images of athletes have been constructed
by TV coverage has been quite interesting, and totally appropriate to
the purposes of this list.  What I was reacting to was a spate of
Tonya Harding jokes and some speculations about the character of
another athlete that really had nothing to do with media studies, and
would have been much more appropriate on alt-gossip.  As more people
get on the internet and join these discussions, we are in danger of
being inundated in inappropriate messages if we don't set some minimal
standards and try to abide by them.
                                                Stephen Brophy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2