SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Stephen Brophy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Mar 1995 10:30:19 CST
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Fri, 10 Mar 1995 12:26:26 CST." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
  I guess I've always assumed that some heavy duty analysis goes on
non-stop during the writing, development, and pre-production phases (I
know these phases are not really distinct) so that what happens on the
set is a result of all the thinking about potential meanings and how
to express them.  And I've also believed that, no matter how much
intended meaning is created by an artist or group of artists, members
of the audience (including academics and other theorists) can still
create their own, different meanings from the materials presented.
                                                Stephen Brophy
                                                Cambridge, Mass.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2