SCREEN-L Archives

March 2004, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:44:18 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
Re: long takes vs tracking shots
From:
Thomas Deane Tucker <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
I haven't followed this thread too much, but after reading James Monaco's
response I was wondering if the entirety of Sukorov's Russian Ark might have
a place in the pantheon of all-time great tracking shot (steadycam) long
takes?

Best,
Thomas Deane Tucker, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Humanities
Chair, Department of Language, Literature, and Communication Arts
Honors Program Director
Chadron State College

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2