SCREEN-L Archives

May 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 May 1993 11:17:42 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
*
* >I'm very suspicious of analyses of TV and movies like the article on
* >_Cheers_ from the _Globe and Mail_.  I think my suspicion flows from a
*
* Zeitgests, like gas, can never be identified until they've passed.
*
Sorry to waste bandwidth with a fairly useless post, but...
 
Bravo, sir!
Your comment, or if not, from whence did it come?
 
Hee friggin hee.
 
--
Mark Bunster                      |Exchange conversation if you dare--
Survey Research Lab--VCU          |Share an empty thought or a laugh.
Richmond, VA 23220                |
[log in to unmask]            |
(804) ELK-O-COP                   |                          -edFROM

ATOM RSS1 RSS2