SCREEN-L Archives

March 2001, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Edward R. O'Neill" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:42:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I very much appreciate Susan Crutchfield's suggestion of _Psycho_ as a text
that's a good compromise between classical and contemporary, us and the
students.

Do other people have experiences of this middle ground?

My own experience is that when students see _Citizen Kane_, most have the
reaction "so what?"  They literally ask me "Why is this film such a big
deal?"

_Vertigo_ can also be a letdown.  A recent group of very well-educated
undergraduates at an elite liberal arts college found it impossible to
identify with Scotty because he is so clearly a misogynist.   All the
psychoanalytic arguments in the world couldn't convince them:  they didn't
"go there."

On the other hand, a colleague suggested using _Edward Scissorhands_ to
teach and analyze mise-en-scene, and that worked wonderfully.

Sincerely,
Edward R. O'Neill

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2