SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 29 Mar 1995 17:06:21 CST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> He loved true scholars, but hated the institutionalized "academics" who
> limited his catholic view of films by categorizing them, excluding them and
> establishing hierarchies and "theories" which kept people from the raw
> material - the films themselves. Of course he encouraged critics, but
> detested those who spoke authoratatively with little or no knowledge of the
> subject.
 
Hmmm...does this mean that I was right, if someone like Langlois seems to
share my views on the "theoritical" views of filmmaking?
 
Just wondering...don't really want to start all of THAT again now...
 
Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2