SCREEN-L Archives

August 2002, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hannes Karnick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:47:41 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hi to all!

Referring to the mail of [log in to unmask]:

It is absolutely misleading to declare L.R. something like an advance guard
in women filmmaking. I cannot understand that anybody isn't able to recognise
the involvement of LR in the nazi business. The phenomena is that she is
accepted in  spite of this especially in the USA.

As mentioned already one of her life lies that no one was harmed due to her
work during the nazi period was proved to be untrue by a German court just
some days ago.

Nothing more has to be said to this absurd arousal of LR.

Regards
Hannes











----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2